What infrastructure was required?

CA VM:Monitor ran on the z/VM operating system. It required a z/VM environment to be present and configured. It did not have any specific dependencies on z/OS or other subsystems.

CA VM:Monitor was deployed on-premise, within the z/VM environment. It was not a cloud-based or SaaS solution.

What administrative interfaces were available?

The product provided a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a GUI for administration and monitoring. The specific interfaces available depended on the version of the product.

What were the main system components?

The main system components included data collectors, a central repository for storing performance data, and reporting tools. These components worked together to gather, store, and present performance information.

What business value did it provide?

CA VM:Monitor provided business value by enabling organizations to optimize the performance of their z/VM environments. By identifying bottlenecks and resource constraints, it helped improve system efficiency and reduce downtime.

What would have happened without it?

Without CA VM:Monitor, organizations would have found it more difficult to proactively identify and resolve performance issues in their z/VM environments. This could have led to reduced system performance, increased downtime, and higher operational costs.

What was the licensing model?

The typical licensing model for CA VM:Monitor was likely perpetual, with ongoing maintenance fees. The total cost of ownership included the initial license fee, maintenance fees, and the cost of personnel required to administer and operate the product.

How was security handled?

CA VM:Monitor incorporated security features to control access to performance data and administrative functions. Specific authentication methods and access control models varied depending on the version of the product.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

The product provided audit logging capabilities to track user activity and system events. This information could be used to monitor security and compliance.

What were common implementation challenges?

Implementing CA VM:Monitor required technical expertise in z/VM and system monitoring. Common implementation challenges included configuring the product to collect the desired performance data, integrating it with existing monitoring tools, and training personnel on its use.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring the product's performance, maintaining its configuration, and applying updates and patches. Staffing requirements depended on the size and complexity of the z/VM environment.

How was user management handled?

Administrative interfaces included a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a graphical user interface (GUI). User management was handled through the z/VM security system or an integrated security solution.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

CA VM:Monitor

Name: CA VM:Monitor
Availability: InStock

CA Technologies Not Supported z/VM

Operating System Monitor

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

CA VM:Monitor was a system monitoring tool designed for z/VM mainframe environments. It provided real-time and historical data on system performance, helping administrators identify bottlenecks and optimize resource utilization. The architecture consisted of data collectors deployed on z/VM LPARs, a central repository for storing performance data, and reporting tools for generating insights.

Data collectors communicated with the central repository using a proprietary protocol. The repository likely used a VSAM or DB2 database for storing performance metrics. Key components included the data collection agents, the central server, and the reporting interface.

These components worked together to gather, store, and present performance information. The product provided a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a GUI for administration and monitoring. User management was handled through the z/VM security system or an integrated security solution.

Configuration parameters included data collection intervals, reporting thresholds, and user access controls. Alternatives to CA VM:Monitor included IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON for z/VM, Info/CPU, and SYSVIEW. These products offered similar capabilities for monitoring and managing z/VM environments.

CA VM:Monitor was deployed on-premise and required specialized z/VM expertise for effective implementation and ongoing management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did CA VM:Monitor do?

CA VM:Monitor was a tool used to observe and analyze the performance of z/VM systems. It provided insights into resource utilization, system activity, and potential bottlenecks. This information helped administrators optimize system performance and troubleshoot issues.

Was this a system, application, or tool?

CA VM:Monitor was a system monitoring tool. It was designed to provide real-time and historical data about the performance of the z/VM operating system and the virtual machines running on it.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that relied on the z/VM operating system for their mainframe environments used CA VM:Monitor. These organizations typically included large enterprises in industries such as banking, finance, insurance, and government.

When should someone have considered CA VM:Monitor?

Companies considered CA VM:Monitor when they needed detailed performance monitoring and analysis capabilities for their z/VM environments. It helped identify performance bottlenecks, optimize resource utilization, and ensure the smooth operation of virtualized workloads.

What were the alternatives to CA VM:Monitor?

Alternatives to CA VM:Monitor include IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON for z/VM, Info/CPU, SYSVIEW, and Rocket TMON PA for z/OS. These products offer similar capabilities for monitoring and managing z/VM environments.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

CA VM:Monitor

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What did CA VM:Monitor do?

Was this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When should someone have considered CA VM:Monitor?

What were the alternatives to CA VM:Monitor?

What infrastructure was required?

How was it deployed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

What were the main system components?

What business value did it provide?

What would have happened without it?

What was the licensing model?

How was security handled?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

What were common implementation challenges?

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

How was user management handled?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

(E)JES

4Tune

ABARS/Assist

ACC

Access 1

ACO SolutionPac

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience