What types of APIs did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM expose?

While specific API details are unavailable, the product likely used native interfaces for integration with CICS and VSAM. These interfaces would have allowed for the initiation of backup, recovery, and journal management operations.

What administrative interfaces were available?

The product utilized a command-line interface (CLI) for administrative tasks. Users would have interacted with the system through commands to manage backups, recoveries, and journal operations. Example commands would include those to initiate backup, restore, and manage journal datasets.

How did the components of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM communicate?

The product's architecture likely involved components for data capture, journaling, and recovery. These components would have communicated using z/OS system services and VSAM access methods.

What databases or storage mechanisms were used, and what configuration files or interfaces were involved?

The product used VSAM datasets for storing data and journals. These datasets were managed by the z/OS operating system. Configuration parameters would have been set through JCL or configuration files.

What business value did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM provide?

Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM provided business value by ensuring data availability and integrity for VSAM datasets accessed by CICS applications. It minimized downtime through fast backup and recovery processes.

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM mitigate risks?

The product reduced the risk of data loss by providing backup and recovery capabilities. The journaling feature enabled point-in-time recovery, minimizing the impact of data corruption or system failures.

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM contribute to business continuity?

By enabling faster recovery times, the product helped to reduce the impact of outages on business operations. This contributed to improved service levels and reduced potential revenue loss.

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM improve operational efficiency?

The product streamlined VSAM data management, reducing the operational overhead associated with backup and recovery processes. This allowed IT staff to focus on other critical tasks.

What security features did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM offer?

Specific security features are not available, but the product likely integrated with z/OS security features for access control. This would have included the use of RACF or similar security products to control access to datasets and system resources.

What authentication methods were supported?

The product would have relied on the security features of the z/OS operating system for authentication. This would have included user ID and password verification, as well as integration with security products like RACF.

What access control model was used?

Access control was likely managed through the z/OS security infrastructure, such as RACF. This would have allowed administrators to define permissions and restrict access to sensitive data and system functions.

What audit and logging capabilities existed?

Audit and logging capabilities were likely provided through z/OS system logging and potentially through the product's own logging mechanisms. This would have allowed administrators to track backup, recovery, and journal operations.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administrative tasks were performed through a command-line interface (CLI). Administrators used commands to initiate backups, perform recoveries, and manage journal datasets. Configuration was managed through JCL and configuration files.

How was user management handled?

User management was handled through the z/OS security system, such as RACF. Administrators would define user access and permissions within the security system to control access to the product's functions.

What were the main configuration parameters?

Key configuration parameters included dataset names, backup schedules, and journal retention policies. These parameters were typically set through JCL or configuration files, allowing customization of backup and recovery processes.

What monitoring and logging capabilities existed?

Monitoring and logging capabilities were provided through z/OS system logs and potentially through the product's own logging mechanisms. These logs would have captured information about backup, recovery, and journal operations.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM

Name: Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM
Availability: InStock

BMC Not Supported z/OS

Files and Datasets (VSAM) Backup and Restore CICS

Vendor

BMC

Product Overview

The architecture of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM comprised several key components designed to facilitate efficient backup and recovery of VSAM datasets. The primary components included a data capture module, a journaling component, and a recovery engine. The data capture module was responsible for intercepting and recording data changes to VSAM datasets.

This module worked in conjunction with CICS to ensure data consistency during the backup process. The journaling component captured these changes and stored them in journal datasets, enabling point-in-time recovery. The recovery engine utilized the journal data to restore VSAM datasets to a specific point in time.

Communication between these components occurred through z/OS system services and VSAM access methods. The product relied on VSAM datasets for storing both data and journal information. Configuration was managed through JCL and configuration files, allowing administrators to customize backup schedules, retention policies, and other operational parameters.

The product is no longer supported; organizations should migrate to a supported solution like BMC Recovery Utility for VSAM.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the primary functions of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM?

Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM provided high-speed backup and recovery capabilities for VSAM datasets accessed by CICS. It also included journaling for VSAM datasets accessed from batch applications. This allowed for forward recovery of VSAM datasets from the journals.

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM integrate with CICS?

The product was designed to integrate with CICS environments to ensure data consistency during backup and recovery operations. It facilitated the restoration of VSAM datasets to a consistent state, crucial for maintaining application integrity.

What types of data could be backed up and recovered using this product?

Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM supported the backup and recovery of VSAM datasets. The journaling feature allowed for point-in-time recovery, enabling users to restore data to a specific state.

What were the main architectural components of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM?

The product's architecture included components for data capture, journaling, and recovery. These components worked together to ensure data integrity and facilitate efficient backup and restore processes.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the primary functions of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM?

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM integrate with CICS?

What types of data could be backed up and recovered using this product?

What were the main architectural components of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM?

What types of APIs did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM expose?

What administrative interfaces were available?

How did the components of Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM communicate?

What databases or storage mechanisms were used, and what configuration files or interfaces were involved?

What business value did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM provide?

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM mitigate risks?

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM contribute to business continuity?

How did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM improve operational efficiency?

What security features did Recovery Plus for CICS/VSAM offer?

What authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What audit and logging capabilities existed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

How was user management handled?

What were the main configuration parameters?

What monitoring and logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from BMC

Similar Products

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing