What was the system architecture of CA Filesave RCS?

The architecture likely involved a central control component managing backup and recovery tasks, agent components on z/OS systems performing the actual data handling, and integration points with VSAM and BDAM datasets. Communication between components would have used z/OS system services.

What APIs did CA Filesave RCS expose?

Without access to the product, specific API details are unavailable. However, backup and recovery solutions often expose APIs for scheduling backups, monitoring progress, and initiating restores. These APIs might have been accessible through programming languages like COBOL or Assembler.

How was CA Filesave RCS configured?

Configuration parameters would have included backup schedules, dataset selection criteria, retention policies, and storage locations. These parameters were likely managed through configuration files or a dedicated administrative interface.

What business value did CA Filesave RCS provide?

The business value of CA Filesave RCS was in automating and streamlining the backup and recovery of critical VSAM and BDAM datasets. This reduced the risk of data loss and minimized downtime, ensuring business continuity.

How did CA Filesave RCS contribute to data integrity?

By integrating with CICS journals and other logging facilities, CA Filesave RCS ensured that backups were transactionally consistent. This meant that recovered data reflected a consistent state, reducing the risk of data corruption.

How did CA Filesave RCS improve operational efficiency?

Automating backup and recovery tasks reduced the need for manual intervention, freeing up IT staff to focus on other critical tasks. This improved operational efficiency and reduced the potential for human error.

How did CA Filesave RCS handle security?

While specific details are unavailable, CA Filesave RCS likely supported standard z/OS security mechanisms for authentication and access control. This might have included integration with RACF or ACF2 for user authentication and authorization.

What access control model was used?

The access control model likely involved assigning permissions to users or groups, determining which datasets and functions they could access. This could have been an ACL-based model or an RBAC model.

What audit logging capabilities existed?

Audit logging capabilities would have tracked backup and recovery operations, providing a record of who accessed what data and when. This information could be used for security monitoring and compliance purposes.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administrative interfaces likely included a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a GUI for managing backup schedules, monitoring backup progress, and configuring system parameters. These interfaces would have been accessible to authorized administrators.

What monitoring capabilities existed?

Monitoring capabilities would have provided real-time information on backup and recovery operations, including status, progress, and any errors encountered. This information would have helped administrators proactively identify and resolve issues.

What logging capabilities existed?

Logging capabilities would have recorded system events, errors, and warnings, providing a detailed audit trail for troubleshooting and analysis. These logs would have been stored in system datasets or log files.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

CA Filesave RCS

Name: CA Filesave RCS
Availability: InStock

CA Technologies Not Supported z/OS

Backup and Restore Files and Datasets

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

CA Filesave RCS was a backup and recovery solution for VSAM and BDAM datasets on z/OS, integrating with CICS journals to ensure transactional consistency. The architecture likely involved a central control component managing backup tasks and agent components on z/OS systems handling data. These components communicated using z/OS system services.

The system used z/OS datasets for storing configuration and logs. While specific API details are unavailable, backup and recovery solutions often expose APIs for scheduling backups and monitoring progress. Configuration parameters included backup schedules, dataset selection criteria, and retention policies, managed through configuration files or an administrative interface.

Competing products include IBM DFSMS, CA Disk, and BMC AMI Data Management. Migration to a supported solution is crucial.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of CA Filesave RCS?

CA Filesave RCS was a backup and recovery solution for VSAM and BDAM datasets on z/OS. It automated the backup and recovery processes, aiming to minimize downtime and data loss.

How did CA Filesave RCS ensure data consistency?

CA Filesave RCS integrated with CICS journals and other logging facilities to ensure transactional consistency during backup and recovery operations. This integration helped maintain data integrity across systems.

What were the common commands used in CA Filesave RCS?

While specific commands are not available due to the product's end-of-life status, typical backup and recovery systems on z/OS involve commands for initiating backups, restoring datasets, and managing backup schedules. These commands are often executed through batch jobs or operator commands.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

CA Filesave RCS

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of CA Filesave RCS?

How did CA Filesave RCS ensure data consistency?

What were the common commands used in CA Filesave RCS?

What was the system architecture of CA Filesave RCS?

What APIs did CA Filesave RCS expose?

How was CA Filesave RCS configured?

What business value did CA Filesave RCS provide?

How did CA Filesave RCS contribute to data integrity?

How did CA Filesave RCS improve operational efficiency?

How did CA Filesave RCS handle security?

What access control model was used?

What audit logging capabilities existed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

What monitoring capabilities existed?

What logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

ABARS/Assist

Adabas Delta Save

Allocate DASD Space and Placement

Allocation Control Center

Application Backup Center

Application Recovery Tool for IMS and DB2

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing