What configuration files did CA Runtrac use?

Specific configuration files are unknown. Batch automation tools often rely on configuration files to define job dependencies, restart rules, and notification settings. These files are typically specific to the z/OS environment.

What was the architecture of CA Runtrac?

The architecture likely involved a central control component managing agents on z/OS systems. These agents would monitor batch jobs and trigger restarts based on predefined rules. Communication protocols would be specific to the z/OS environment.

What business value did CA Runtrac provide?

By automating batch job restarts, CA Runtrac reduced manual intervention, minimized downtime, and improved overall efficiency. This resulted in cost savings and faster turnaround times for critical business processes.

How did CA Runtrac help meet SLAs?

Automated restarts ensured timely completion of batch processes, supporting service level agreements (SLAs) and minimizing disruptions to business operations. This improved customer satisfaction and reduced the risk of financial penalties.

How was security handled in CA Runtrac?

Specific authentication methods are unknown. Batch automation tools typically support standard authentication methods like LDAP or Active Directory for user authentication. Access control is often role-based, with permissions assigned to different user roles.

Was data encrypted in CA Runtrac?

Details on specific encryption methods are unavailable. Batch automation tools often use encryption to protect sensitive data during transmission and storage. The specific encryption algorithms used depend on the security requirements of the tool and the z/OS environment.

Did CA Runtrac have audit logging?

Audit logging capabilities are standard in batch automation tools. These logs track user activity, job executions, and system events, providing a record for security auditing and troubleshooting.

How was CA Runtrac administered?

Administrative interfaces likely included a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a web-based GUI for managing the system. These interfaces would allow administrators to configure job definitions, restart rules, and user access.

What monitoring capabilities did CA Runtrac have?

Monitoring capabilities would have included real-time dashboards and alerts for tracking job status and identifying potential issues. These tools would provide insights into system performance and help administrators proactively address problems.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

CA Runtrac

Name: CA Runtrac
Availability: InStock

CA Technologies Not Supported z/OS

Batch Automation

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

CA Runtrac automated the restarting of failed batch jobs on z/OS systems. It allowed restarts at the failing step, avoiding a complete rerun. While specific commands are unavailable, batch automation tools typically involve commands for job submission, monitoring, and control interacting with the z/OS scheduler.

Details on specific APIs are unavailable; however, batch automation tools often provide APIs for integration with other systems, potentially using protocols like REST or SOAP. The architecture likely involved a central control component managing agents on z/OS systems. These agents monitored batch jobs and triggered restarts based on predefined rules.

Communication protocols would be specific to the z/OS environment. The system likely used a database to store job history, configuration data, and audit logs. Given that CA Runtrac is no longer supported, organizations should migrate to alternatives like IBM Workload Scheduler, BMC Control-M, or Stonebranch Universal Automation Center.

Migration involves exporting job definitions and configurations and importing them into the new platform. Thorough testing is crucial. Consider a phased migration approach to minimize disruption.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of CA Runtrac?

CA Runtrac automated the restarting of failed batch jobs on z/OS systems. It allowed restarts at the failing step, avoiding a complete rerun from the beginning.

What types of commands were used with CA Runtrac?

While specific commands are unavailable due to the product's unsupported status, batch automation tools typically involve commands for job submission, monitoring, and control. These commands often interact with the z/OS operating system's job scheduler.

Did CA Runtrac have an API?

Details on specific APIs are unavailable. However, batch automation tools often provide APIs for integration with other systems, potentially using protocols like REST or SOAP for communication.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

CA Runtrac

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of CA Runtrac?

What types of commands were used with CA Runtrac?

Did CA Runtrac have an API?

What configuration files did CA Runtrac use?

What was the architecture of CA Runtrac?

Did CA Runtrac use a database?

What business value did CA Runtrac provide?

How did CA Runtrac help meet SLAs?

How was security handled in CA Runtrac?

Was data encrypted in CA Runtrac?

Did CA Runtrac have audit logging?

How was CA Runtrac administered?

What monitoring capabilities did CA Runtrac have?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

_beta access monitor

$avers

ABARS/Assist

ACC

ACO SolutionPac

ADC2

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing