What were some common commands and their syntax?

While specific command syntax varied, common operations included commands to define reports, specify data sources (like SMF), and manage data archiving. Example: `DEFINE REPORT REPORT_NAME ...` to create a new report.

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

Configuration was managed through control files and potentially through ISPF panels. These files defined report parameters, data source locations, and archiving schedules.

What types of APIs did Performance Reporter expose?

The product likely used a proprietary API for internal component communication. Details on external APIs are unavailable due to the product's end-of-life status.

What were the main system components?

The architecture included components for data collection, data processing, reporting, and database interaction. These components worked together to gather, analyze, and present performance data.

What was the business value of using Performance Reporter?

Performance Reporter enabled users to analyze system performance, identify bottlenecks, and optimize resource utilization. This led to improved system efficiency and cost savings.

How did Performance Reporter assist with capacity planning?

By providing detailed reports on system usage, Performance Reporter helped in capacity planning. This allowed organizations to anticipate future resource needs and make informed investment decisions.

How did Performance Reporter help in identifying performance trends?

The product's reporting capabilities facilitated trend analysis, allowing users to identify performance degradation over time. This enabled proactive problem-solving and prevented potential outages.

How did Performance Reporter contribute to infrastructure optimization?

Performance Reporter provided insights into resource utilization, helping organizations optimize their IT infrastructure. This led to better resource allocation and reduced operational costs.

What authentication methods were supported?

Specific security features are not available due to the product's end-of-life status. However, it likely integrated with z/OS security features for authentication and access control.

What access control model was used?

The access control model likely relied on z/OS security mechanisms, such as RACF or similar security products, to manage user permissions and access to data and resources.

What encryption was used and where?

Details on encryption are unavailable due to the product's end-of-life status. However, data stored in DB2 databases may have utilized DB2's encryption capabilities.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

Audit and logging capabilities were likely present to track user activities and system events. These logs would have been crucial for security monitoring and incident investigation.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administrative interfaces likely included ISPF panels and potentially a command-line interface (CLI) for managing the system. These interfaces allowed administrators to configure and monitor the product.

How was user management handled?

User management was likely handled through integration with z/OS security systems, such as RACF. This allowed administrators to manage user access and permissions centrally.

What were the main configuration parameters?

Main configuration parameters included settings for data sources (SMF, IMS logs), report definitions, archiving schedules, and database connections. These parameters controlled the product's behavior.

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Monitoring capabilities likely included the ability to track data collection, processing, and reporting activities. Logging provided detailed information for troubleshooting and performance analysis.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Performance Reporter

Name: Performance Reporter
Availability: InStock

IBM Not Supported z/OS

Report Generation and Management Usage Accounting/SMF

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

The architecture of Performance Reporter comprised several key components. The Data Collection component gathered data from sources like SMF records and IMS logs. The Data Processing component transformed and prepared the data for analysis.

The Reporting component generated reports based on user-defined criteria. The Database Interaction component managed the storage and retrieval of historical data in DB2 databases. Communication between components likely occurred through internal APIs.

Configuration was managed through control files and ISPF panels. The product's main function was to provide a comprehensive view of system performance, enabling users to identify bottlenecks, optimize resource utilization, and plan for future capacity needs. The product has been replaced by solutions like IBM Z Performance and Capacity Analytics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What data sources did Performance Reporter use?

Performance Reporter collected system usage and performance data from sources like SMF records and IMS logs. It provided options to summarize, archive, or delete historical data. Reporting capabilities allowed analysis of past and present data.

Where was historical data stored?

Performance Reporter stored historical data in DB2 databases. This allowed for efficient storage and retrieval of large datasets used for performance analysis and reporting.

What data management options were available?

Performance Reporter offered capabilities to summarize, archive, and delete historical data. These features helped manage data volume and maintain data integrity over time.

What reporting capabilities did Performance Reporter offer?

The product provided reporting options to analyze both past and present data. This enabled users to identify trends, troubleshoot issues, and optimize system performance.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Share Your Product Experience

Performance Reporter

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What data sources did Performance Reporter use?

Where was historical data stored?

What data management options were available?

What reporting capabilities did Performance Reporter offer?

What were some common commands and their syntax?

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

What types of APIs did Performance Reporter expose?

What were the main system components?

What was the business value of using Performance Reporter?

How did Performance Reporter assist with capacity planning?

How did Performance Reporter help in identifying performance trends?

How did Performance Reporter contribute to infrastructure optimization?

What authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What encryption was used and where?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

How was user management handled?

What were the main configuration parameters?

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from IBM

Similar Products

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience