For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

StarTool APM ran on the z/OS platform. It was dependent on the z/OS operating system and its subsystems.

What infrastructure was required?

StarTool APM required the z/OS operating system to be present. It also likely required specific subsystems and libraries to be available.

How did StarTool APM collect performance data?

StarTool APM used sampling techniques to collect performance data. It reported on CPU, I/O, and other resource usage by module and offset.

What were the main architecture components?

The specific architecture components of StarTool APM are not readily available. However, it likely included data collection agents, a central repository, and reporting tools.

What was the business value of StarTool APM?

StarTool APM helped organizations identify and resolve performance bottlenecks in their z/OS applications. This led to improved application response times, reduced resource consumption, and better overall system performance.

How did StarTool APM reduce costs?

By optimizing application performance, StarTool APM helped organizations reduce their mainframe resource costs. This included CPU usage, I/O operations, and storage requirements.

What was the licensing model?

The licensing model for StarTool APM is not readily available. However, it likely involved a perpetual license or a subscription-based model.

What security features did StarTool APM have?

Specific security features of StarTool APM are not readily available. However, it likely included access controls to protect performance data and prevent unauthorized access to system resources.

What authentication methods were supported?

The authentication methods used by StarTool APM are not readily available. However, it likely integrated with z/OS security systems such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret.

What access control model was used?

The access control model used by StarTool APM is not readily available. However, it likely used a role-based access control (RBAC) model to manage user permissions.

How was StarTool APM deployed?

The deployment of StarTool APM likely involved installing agents on z/OS systems and configuring them to collect performance data. A central server was then used to store and analyze the data.

What level of technical expertise was required?

Implementing StarTool APM required expertise in z/OS systems and application performance monitoring. Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring the agents, maintaining the central server, and analyzing performance data.

What were common implementation challenges?

Common implementation challenges included configuring the agents to collect the right data, ensuring the central server had sufficient resources, and interpreting the performance data to identify bottlenecks.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

StarTool APM

Name: StarTool APM
Availability: InStock

Serena Software Inc Not Supported z/OS

Performance Application Development

Vendor

Serena Software Inc

Product Overview

StarTool APM was designed as a sampling-based application performance monitor for z/OS systems. Its primary function was to provide detailed insights into resource consumption, specifically CPU, I/O, and memory usage, at a granular level. The architecture involved agents deployed on z/OS LPARs that collected performance data.

This data was then aggregated and analyzed to produce reports on resource usage by module and offset. The tool helped identify performance bottlenecks and optimize application performance. StarTool APM is no longer supported.

Organizations should migrate to alternatives like IBM Z Performance and Capacity Analytics, Compuware Topaz, or BMC AMI Ops Monitor for z/OS. These solutions typically involve a similar architecture, with agents collecting data and a central server for analysis and reporting. Ensure the replacement solution integrates with your existing z/OS security infrastructure, such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret.

The migration should also consider the existing monitoring and alerting workflows to minimize disruption.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did StarTool APM do?

StarTool APM was a sampling-based application performance monitor for z/OS systems. It provided insights into CPU, I/O, and other resource usage at the module level, helping identify performance bottlenecks.

Was this a system, application, or tool?

StarTool APM was a tool designed to monitor and analyze application performance on z/OS systems. It helped organizations understand how their applications were using system resources.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that relied on z/OS mainframe systems for critical applications used StarTool APM. These included companies in finance, insurance, and other industries where mainframe performance was essential.

When should we have considered StarTool APM?

Companies considered using StarTool APM when they needed to identify performance bottlenecks in their z/OS applications. It helped optimize resource usage and improve application response times.

What were the alternatives to StarTool APM?

Alternatives to StarTool APM include IBM Z Performance and Capacity Analytics, Compuware Topaz, and BMC AMI Ops Monitor for z/OS. These products offer similar application performance monitoring capabilities for z/OS environments.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience