What infrastructure was required?

Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS required a z/OS environment with access to the IMS database. It also needed connectivity to the target systems where the extracted data would be loaded, such as a data warehouse or other reporting platform.

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

As a mainframe product, it ran within an LPAR under z/OS. It was dependent on the IMS subsystem being active and accessible. It may have also required specific security configurations to access the IMS data.

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

The product likely used configuration files to define the data extraction parameters, such as the IMS segments to extract and the target data format. It may have also provided a command-line interface or ISPF panels for administration and control.

What types of APIs did this product expose?

The exact API capabilities are not fully known, but it likely provided some form of interface to initiate and monitor data extraction jobs. This could have been a set of callable routines or a command-line interface that could be invoked from other programs.

What was the business value of using this product?

The primary business value was the ability to unlock data stored in IMS databases and make it available for other business purposes, such as reporting, analytics, and data warehousing. This enabled organizations to gain insights from their mainframe data and improve decision-making.

What would happen if an organization did not use this product?

Without this product, organizations would have faced challenges in accessing and integrating data from their IMS databases. This could have led to data silos, delayed reporting, and limited ability to leverage mainframe data for business intelligence.

What was the typical licensing model?

The licensing model was likely a perpetual license with annual maintenance fees. The total cost of ownership would have included the initial license fee, maintenance fees, and the cost of technical expertise to implement and operate the product.

How was security handled?

Security was handled through integration with z/OS security systems, such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret. Access to IMS data was controlled based on user IDs and permissions defined in these security systems.

What specific authentication methods were supported?

Authentication was performed through the z/OS security system. Users were required to have a valid user ID and password to access the system and the IMS data. Multi-factor authentication may have been supported depending on the z/OS security configuration.

What access control model was used?

The access control model was likely based on a combination of Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and Access Control Lists (ACLs). Users were assigned roles that granted them specific permissions to access IMS data. ACLs may have been used to further restrict access to specific data segments.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring the data extraction jobs, ensuring the availability of the z/OS and IMS environments, and managing user access and security. Regular maintenance was also required to apply patches and updates.

What were common implementation challenges?

Implementation challenges included configuring the data extraction parameters, ensuring compatibility with the target data warehouse or reporting platform, and addressing any performance issues related to data extraction and transfer. Expertise in both IMS and z/OS was essential.

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Monitoring and logging capabilities likely included the ability to track the progress of data extraction jobs, identify any errors or failures, and audit user access and security events. This information was typically stored in z/OS system logs or dedicated log files.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS

Name: Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS
Availability: InStock

CA Technologies Not Supported z/OS

Data Discovery Mining and Processi IMS Databases

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS provided a mechanism for extracting data from IMS databases on z/OS systems. It enabled organizations to integrate mainframe data with data warehouses and other applications for reporting and analytics. The architecture likely involved components running within an LPAR, accessing IMS data through standard interfaces, and transferring data to target systems via TCP/IP or other protocols.

Key architectural considerations included the configuration of data extraction parameters, security integration with z/OS security systems (RACF, ACF2, Top Secret), and performance optimization for large data volumes. Given that the product is no longer supported, organizations should migrate to a modern data integration platform. Alternatives include IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, and Precisely Connect.

Migration involves re-architecting existing data flows, ensuring compatibility with the new platform, and validating data integrity. The new architecture should also address security and performance requirements, leveraging modern data integration patterns and technologies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS do?

Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS was a utility designed to extract data from IMS databases, primarily for use in data warehousing and other applications requiring access to mainframe data. It facilitated the transfer of data from the hierarchical IMS structure into more accessible formats.

Was this a system, application, or tool?

It was a tool designed to extend the capabilities of IMS databases by providing a means to extract and transform data for use in other systems. It was not a complete system or application in itself, but rather a utility that enhanced data accessibility.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that relied on IMS databases for critical business data and needed to integrate that data with other systems or data warehouses would have used this tool. These were typically large enterprises in industries like banking, insurance, and government.

When should a company have considered using Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS?

Companies would have considered using Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS when they needed to move data out of their IMS databases for reporting, analytics, or integration with other systems. This was particularly relevant when organizations were building data warehouses or business intelligence solutions.

What are the alternatives to Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS?

Alternatives include other data extraction tools specifically designed for IMS databases, such as those offered by IBM or other third-party vendors specializing in mainframe data management. Modern data integration platforms can also provide similar capabilities.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS do?

Was this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When should a company have considered using Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS?

What are the alternatives to Unicenter Database Extractor for IMS?

What infrastructure was required?

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

What types of APIs did this product expose?

What was the business value of using this product?

What would happen if an organization did not use this product?

What was the typical licensing model?

How was security handled?

What specific authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

What were common implementation challenges?

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

3270 SUPEROPTIMIZER/IMS

Access Manager for CICS

Access Manager for IMS

ADABAS

Adabas DL/1 Bridge

Adabas Text Retrieval

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing