What storage mechanisms did Barr/NJE use?

Barr/NJE relied on the underlying z/OS system for file storage. It did not have its own dedicated database. Files were stored using standard z/OS datasets and accessed through NJE protocols.

What were the main system components of Barr/NJE?

The system components included the NJE transmitter and receiver, which handled file transfer. These components communicated using NJE protocols over TCP/IP networks. Configuration was managed through JCL and system parameters.

What configuration files or interfaces were used by Barr/NJE?

Configuration was primarily managed through JCL (Job Control Language) and system parameters within the z/OS environment. There were no separate configuration files specific to Barr/NJE beyond the standard NJE setup.

What types of APIs did Barr/NJE expose?

Barr/NJE did not expose any APIs for external integration. Its functionality was accessed through the NJE protocol and z/OS job submission mechanisms. There was no support for REST, SOAP, or other API types.

What business value did Barr/NJE provide?

Barr/NJE provided a means to transfer files and jobs between z/OS systems. This improved operational efficiency by automating file exchange and job submission. It reduced manual intervention in mainframe environments.

How did Barr/NJE improve data integrity?

By automating file transfers, Barr/NJE reduced the potential for human error. It ensured reliable data exchange between systems. This improved the overall integrity of data processing workflows.

How did Barr/NJE improve job submission processes?

Barr/NJE streamlined job submission processes. It allowed users to submit jobs to remote systems without manual intervention. This improved productivity and reduced turnaround times for batch processing.

How did Barr/NJE optimize resource utilization?

The product's integration with JES2/JES3 systems facilitated efficient resource utilization. It enabled the distribution of workloads across multiple systems. This optimized the use of mainframe resources.

What authentication methods were supported by Barr/NJE?

Barr/NJE relied on the security features of the underlying z/OS system. It did not implement its own authentication mechanisms. Access control was managed through z/OS security configurations.

What access control model was used?

Access control was managed through the z/OS security model, which typically involved RACF or similar security products. User permissions were defined at the dataset and resource levels.

What encryption was used by Barr/NJE?

Barr/NJE did not provide built-in encryption. Data security relied on the encryption capabilities of the z/OS system and the network infrastructure. Secure protocols like TLS were not directly supported.

What audit and logging capabilities existed?

Audit and logging were handled through the z/OS system's logging facilities. Security events and file transfer activities were recorded in system logs. This allowed for monitoring and auditing of operations.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administrative tasks were performed through the z/OS console and system utilities. There was no dedicated GUI or web console for Barr/NJE. Configuration changes were made via JCL and system parameters.

How was user management handled?

User management was handled through the z/OS security system, such as RACF. User accounts and permissions were managed within the mainframe environment. Barr/NJE did not have its own user management features.

What were the main configuration parameters?

The main configuration parameters were defined in JCL and system initialization datasets. These parameters controlled aspects like network addresses, file transfer options, and job submission settings.

What monitoring and logging capabilities existed?

Monitoring and logging were provided through z/OS system logs and monitoring tools. System administrators could monitor file transfer activities and job submissions. There were no specific Barr/NJE monitoring tools.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Barr/NJE

Name: Barr/NJE
Availability: InStock

Barr Systems Not Supported z/OS

Networks and Communication File Transfer

Vendor

Barr Systems

Product Overview

The architecture of Barr/NJE comprised several key components. The NJE transmitter and receiver were central to file transfer operations. These components communicated using NJE protocols over TCP/IP networks.

The system relied on z/OS datasets for file storage, with no dedicated database. Configuration was managed through JCL and system parameters. Security was handled through the z/OS security model, such as RACF, for authentication and access control.

The product did not offer built-in encryption. The main system components included the NJE transmitter, NJE receiver, and the z/OS operating system. The NJE transmitter handled the sending of files and job information, while the NJE receiver handled the receipt.

Communication occurred over TCP/IP networks using NJE protocols. The system integrated with JES2/JES3 for job submission and output retrieval. The Barr Host Communications Suite is the recommended replacement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of Barr/NJE?

Barr/NJE facilitated file transfer to JES2/JES3 systems on z/OS. It enabled users to submit jobs and exchange data across a network. The product is now integrated into the Barr Host Communications Suite.

What communication protocols did Barr/NJE use?

Barr/NJE utilized Network Job Entry (NJE) protocols for communication. This allowed for the transfer of files and job submissions between z/OS systems. The specific protocols used were dependent on the NJE implementation.

How did Barr/NJE integrate with JES2 and JES3?

Barr/NJE was designed to work with JES2 and JES3 job entry subsystems. It allowed users to submit jobs and receive output from these systems. The integration was seamless for users interacting with z/OS environments.

What were the key limitations of Barr/NJE?

The product's core function was to transfer files and job information. It did not offer advanced features like data transformation or complex workflow management. Its focus was on reliable NJE file transfer.

Related Products

ACF/NCP is a mainframe-based network operating system for communication controllers, initially developed in the 1970s. It supports protocols like SDLC, X.25, and SNA, enabling connectivity...

Supporting Services Networks and Communication

View Details →

ACF/SSP

Supported

by IBM

z/OS

ACF/SSP is a suite of programs designed to support and manage ACF/NCP (Network Control Program) on z/OS systems. Key components include the NCPGEN utility for...

Supporting Services Networks and Communication

View Details →

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now