Name: IMS Recovery Saver
Availability: InStock

Question 1

What was the primary function of IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver merged IMS image copies and logs to create a new image copy at a specific point in time. This allowed for the restoration of IMS databases to a consistent state after errors or failures. The process involved analyzing logs to identify changes and applying them to the image copies.

Question 2

What platforms and database systems did IMS Recovery Saver support?

Accepted Answer

The product was designed to work with IMS databases on the z/OS platform. It utilized the existing IMS logging and image copy mechanisms to perform its recovery operations. The specific versions of IMS supported would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 3

What were the main benefits of using IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver provided a method to recover IMS databases to a consistent state. This was crucial for maintaining data integrity and minimizing downtime in the event of data corruption or system failures. It offered a more granular recovery option compared to full database restores.

Question 4

What key features did IMS Recovery Saver offer?

Accepted Answer

The product's capabilities included merging image copies and logs, applying changes to a specific point in time, and creating new image copies. These features enabled users to restore databases to a known good state, reducing data loss and downtime. The specific commands would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 5

What interface did users interact with to use IMS Recovery Saver, and what was the general command structure?

Accepted Answer

The product used a command-line interface (CLI) for operation. Users would issue commands to specify the image copies, logs, and the desired point in time for recovery. The syntax would involve parameters for input datasets, output datasets, and the recovery timestamp. For example, commands would specify the input image copy datasets, the log datasets, and the target recovery time.

Question 6

What were the main architectural components of IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

The architecture consisted of components for reading image copies, analyzing logs, applying changes, and creating new image copies. These components worked together to ensure data consistency during the recovery process. The specific component names and their functions would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 7

What storage mechanisms did IMS Recovery Saver utilize?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver primarily used sequential datasets for storing image copies and logs. These datasets were accessed directly by the product's components during the recovery process. The specific dataset naming conventions and storage mechanisms would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 8

Did IMS Recovery Saver provide any APIs for integration with other systems?

Accepted Answer

The product did not expose any external APIs. All interactions were performed through the command-line interface. There was no support for programmatic access or integration with other systems through APIs.

Question 9

How did IMS Recovery Saver contribute to business value?

Accepted Answer

By enabling point-in-time recovery, IMS Recovery Saver helped minimize data loss and reduce the time required to restore databases after failures. This resulted in improved system availability and reduced operational costs. The ability to recover to a specific point in time was a key differentiator.

Question 10

How did IMS Recovery Saver help ensure data integrity?

Accepted Answer

The product's ability to restore databases to a consistent state after errors or failures helped maintain data integrity. This was crucial for ensuring the reliability of business applications that relied on IMS databases. The recovery process helped prevent data corruption and inconsistencies.

Question 11

How did IMS Recovery Saver improve business continuity?

Accepted Answer

The product reduced the impact of data corruption or system failures by enabling faster recovery. This minimized downtime and allowed businesses to resume operations more quickly. The ability to recover to a specific point in time was a key advantage.

Question 12

How did IMS Recovery Saver contribute to operational efficiency?

Accepted Answer

By providing a more granular recovery option than full database restores, IMS Recovery Saver allowed businesses to recover only the necessary data. This reduced the time and resources required for recovery, leading to cost savings. The ability to recover to a specific point in time was a key advantage.

Question 13

What security features were provided by IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver did not have built-in security features such as authentication or access control. Security was managed at the z/OS level, where access to datasets and system resources was controlled. The product relied on the underlying z/OS security infrastructure.

Question 14

What encryption methods were supported by IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

The product did not offer any encryption capabilities. Data security relied on the encryption features available within the z/OS environment. The protection of data at rest and in transit was handled by the underlying operating system and storage systems.

Question 15

What audit logging capabilities were available in IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver did not have its own audit logging capabilities. Auditing was performed through the z/OS system, which tracked access to datasets and system resources. The z/OS security subsystem provided the necessary audit trails.

Question 16

What administrative interfaces were available for IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

Administration was performed through the command-line interface (CLI). Users would issue commands to configure the recovery process, specify input and output datasets, and manage the recovery operations. The specific commands and parameters would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 17

How was user management handled in IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

User management was handled at the z/OS level. Access to the product's datasets and commands was controlled through z/OS security features, such as RACF or equivalent security systems. User authentication and authorization were managed by the z/OS security subsystem.

Question 18

What were the main configuration parameters for IMS Recovery Saver?

Accepted Answer

The main configuration parameters included the input image copy datasets, the log datasets, the output image copy dataset, and the target recovery point in time. These parameters were specified through the command-line interface. The specific parameters would be detailed in the product documentation.

Question 19

What monitoring and logging capabilities were available?

Accepted Answer

IMS Recovery Saver did not have built-in monitoring capabilities. Monitoring of the recovery process was typically performed through z/OS system monitoring tools. The progress of the recovery operations could be tracked through system logs and job output. The specific monitoring methods would be detailed in the product documentation.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

IMS Recovery Saver

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of IMS Recovery Saver?

What platforms and database systems did IMS Recovery Saver support?

What were the main benefits of using IMS Recovery Saver?

What key features did IMS Recovery Saver offer?

What interface did users interact with to use IMS Recovery Saver, and what was the general command structure?

What were the main architectural components of IMS Recovery Saver?

What storage mechanisms did IMS Recovery Saver utilize?

Did IMS Recovery Saver provide any APIs for integration with other systems?

How did IMS Recovery Saver contribute to business value?

How did IMS Recovery Saver help ensure data integrity?

How did IMS Recovery Saver improve business continuity?

How did IMS Recovery Saver contribute to operational efficiency?

What security features were provided by IMS Recovery Saver?

What encryption methods were supported by IMS Recovery Saver?

What audit logging capabilities were available in IMS Recovery Saver?

What administrative interfaces were available for IMS Recovery Saver?

How was user management handled in IMS Recovery Saver?

What were the main configuration parameters for IMS Recovery Saver?

What monitoring and logging capabilities were available?

Related Products

More from IBM

Access 1

ACF/NCP

ACF/SSP

ACO SolutionPac

Ada/370

ADF II

Similar Products

3270 SUPEROPTIMIZER/IMS

ABARS/Assist

Access Manager for CICS

Access Manager for IMS

ADABAS

Adabas Delta Save

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience